Jonathan Haaswritingnowusesabout
emailgithubx
Jonathan Haaswritingnowusesabout

The Answer Is Obvious -- You Just Don't Like It

April 19, 2025·2 min read

Most 'intractable' problems aren't unsolvable. They just require giving up something you're emotionally attached to.

#decision-making#leadership#problem-solving

Most problems labeled "intractable" aren't unsolvable. They require giving up something the decision-maker is emotionally attached to -- a core assumption, a beloved strategy, a sense of identity. The solution exists. It's just unacceptable.

The resistance doesn't feel like resistance. It feels like logic. "That wouldn't work because..." "We tried that before..." "That's not who we are." These sound like analytical objections. They're identity protection mechanisms with analytical camouflage.

The Problem-Premise Distinction

Every stuck situation has two layers. The problem is what you say is wrong: "people aren't converting," "we can't find product-market fit," "the team isn't performing." The premise is what you believe must be true for your current strategy to work: "this market is ready," "this business model is viable," "this team can execute at this level."

When solutions aren't working, the instinct is to tweak the solution. Change the messaging. Adjust the pricing. Hire a coach. But the failure is usually one layer deeper -- the premise is broken. And examining the premise is terrifying, because it leads to a specific conclusion: if that assumption isn't true, everything built on top of it needs to change.

So organizations double down. Sunk cost. Identity attachment. The fear that admitting the premise was wrong means the last two years were wasted. They keep optimizing a strategy whose foundation has already cracked, hoping for a breakthrough that won't come because the constraint isn't tactical. It's structural.

The Diagnostic

List the things you refuse to change. The business model. The target market. The founding team's roles. The technical architecture. The pricing strategy. Now ask a specific question about each one: is this a genuine constraint, or is it a preference I've promoted to a constraint because changing it would be painful?

The constraints we call "strategic" are often self-imposed cages. The market you refuse to abandon might be the wrong market. The business model you refuse to revisit might be the thing that's breaking every downstream metric. The team structure you refuse to change might be the reason execution is stalling.

The answer to most "intractable" problems is sitting in the list of things you won't consider. It's not hard to find. It's hard to accept.

share

Continue reading

Clarity Over Compromise: Making the Right Call on Work Models

When it comes to remote work, hybrid setups, and office mandates, most debates miss the real point. It's not about which model is _better_ in some...

The Confidence Cliff: Why Overcertainty Kills Good Decisions

You've probably seen this play out. Someone shares an idea--bold, certain, maybe even brilliant-sounding.

The Three Types of Startup Advice (And Why They're All Wrong)

The most dangerous thing about startup advice isn't that it's wrong -- it's that it's partially right. Each type comes with its own flavor of wrong.

emailgithubx