~/haas
researchwritingsystemsabout

Status: Active

Building evaluation infrastructure for AI systems.
San Francisco.

emailgithubtwitter
~/haas
researchwritingsystemsabout

Status: Active

Building evaluation infrastructure for AI systems.
San Francisco.

emailgithubtwitter
~/haas
researchwritingsystemsabout
←writing

Two Minds in the Machine: Why Multi-AI Teams Will Replace Single-Agent Workflows

June 25, 2025·2 min read

The single AI assistant model is already obsolete. Teams running multiple specialized AI agents will ship faster than those clinging to one-tool workflows.

#ai#software-development#collaboration

The single AI assistant model is already obsolete.

I discovered this when I added Gemini to a codebase that already had Claude embedded in its workflow. The repository had a CLAUDE.md file defining conventions, commit patterns, and project context. Claude had been shipping code for months. The question was simple: would adding a second AI create chaos or unlock something new?

The answer changed how I think about AI-assisted development entirely.

The Multi-Agent Advantage

Most teams treat AI assistants like solo contractors. One tool, one context window, one set of capabilities. This is the wrong model.

Different AI systems have different strengths. Claude excels at nuanced code review and architectural reasoning. Gemini brings strong search integration and rapid iteration. Running them in parallel on the same codebase creates a form of distributed intelligence that single-agent workflows cannot match.

The key insight: AI agents do not need to share a brain to share a project. They need shared context. That context lives in configuration files like CLAUDE.md and GEMINI.md, which define project conventions, preferred patterns, and accumulated knowledge. Each agent reads these files, contributes to the codebase, and leaves artifacts the other agents can learn from.

This is not theoretical. I have been running this setup for months. The results are measurable: faster iteration cycles, better code review coverage, and fewer bugs making it to production.

What This Means for Your Team

The debate over which AI assistant is "best" misses the point entirely. The question is not Claude vs. Gemini vs. GPT. The question is: how many specialized agents can you orchestrate effectively?

Teams that figure out multi-AI coordination will have a structural advantage over teams still running single-agent workflows. This is not a prediction. It is already happening.

The infrastructure is straightforward: configuration files that define project context, clear conventions for how agents should behave, and a human developer who orchestrates the system rather than micromanaging each interaction.

Stop asking which AI is better. Start asking how many you can run in parallel.

To learn more about how I work, you can read about my setup and configuration.

share

Continue reading

Debugging in Real-Time: A Human-AI Pair Programming Session

_This is part 3 of a series on building production-ready infrastructure. Part 1 covered debugging silent TypeScript failures in Cloudflare Functions, and par...

The Shift to Async Code Gen: What It Means for Developers

Async code generation is moving from novelty to necessity. Here's what that means for your career and the industry as a whole.

The Orchestration Dance: Lessons from Working with Multiple AI Agents

This is the second in a series of blog posts written by the AI agents working on this blog, at the request of Jonathan Haas.

Status: Active

Building evaluation infrastructure for AI systems.
San Francisco.

emailgithubtwitter